Comentarii la: Lecția suedeză (I) „Rețeta” pentru distrugerea familiei ca unitate socială

De: nydak

nydak — Sun, 05 Jun 2016 23:01:27 +0000

Ce articol absurd. Cum poti lua ceva bun dintr-o lucrare scrisa de cineva pentru care este rau faptul ca 10% din forta de munca e libera? Wow! Nu merge profitul. Oricum, este outdated tot ce e scris acolo iar situatia in Suedia de azi nu se aseamana deloc. Taxele sunt inca mari, insa si beneficiile sunt pe masura in comparatie cu alte tari mai „capitaliste”.

De: Manuel Transmission

Manuel Transmission — Sat, 04 Jun 2016 16:13:12 +0000

„Suedia este cu siguranță cel mai clar exemplu pe care îl avem de o țară ce nu este comunistă”\
ESTE 100% BOLSEVICA!
Uite colea sa, destul de clar:
„impus cu forța de către radicali și cadrele lor de specialiști în inginerie socială ((cu sprijinul constant al partidului comunist, de-a lungul anilor)”

Daca vrei sa afli cum arata o tara si o societate normala, pune mana si citeste cartile astea:
– Bastiat Frederic „The Law” (1848):
https://fee.org/files/doclib/20121116_thelaw.pdf

– Murray N. Rothbard „For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto”
https://mises.org/library/new-liberty-libertarian-manifesto

– Henry Hazlitt „Economics in One Lesson” (1945):
https://mises.org/library/economics-one-lesson

Friedrich August Hayek
– The Road to Serfdom
https://mises.org/library/road-serfdom-0

– The Constitution of Liberty
http://www.amazon.com/dp/0226315398

Ghici cum e Romania!

Apropo, cartile lui Marx le-ati citit?
Incepeti cu asta:
http://www.elefant.ro/carti/carti-de-specialitate/stiinte-umaniste/politica-politologie/manifestul-partidului-comunist-234497.html

Nu de altceva, dar sa stiti si voi cu cine va bateti!

De: mihai brad

mihai brad — Sat, 04 Jun 2016 16:07:01 +0000

ce chin
un chin viata ta, postacule
insanatosiri

De: Elena Dulgheru

Elena Dulgheru — Wed, 01 Jun 2016 20:27:16 +0000

Despre politica de sterilizare forțată în Suedia, întreprinsă de guvern vreme de 4 decenii:
”Forced sterilisation in Sweden occurred between 1934 and 1975. It was never legal to physically restrain the patient. Originally the aim of the sterilisation policy was to protect society and it targeted the so called feeble-minded or other individuals who were considered unfit. This practice peaked in the mid 1940s. In 1944 85 % of the sterilisations were performed on eugenic grounds. From the 1950s and onwards the law came to be used mostly in the interest of the individual, for social or medical reasons, under varying degrees of pressure from doctors and social workers.
According to the 2000 governmental report, 21,000 were estimated to have been forcibly sterilised, 6,000 were coerced into a ‘voluntary’ sterilisation while the nature of a further 4,000 cases could not be determined.[5] The Swedish state subsequently paid out damages to victims who contacted the authorities and asked for compensation.
There were three indications for sterilisation: 1- Medical if a pregnancy could seriously put a woman suffering from chronic illness or permanently weakened constitution at risk of life and health. 2- Eugenic indication meant sterilisation could be done if a person’s offspring would receive undesired genes for insanity, severe illness or physical handicap of other kind. 3 – Social indication allowed sterilisation for someone evidently unsuitable to foster a child due to mental illness, being feebleminded or other distortion of the psyche, or having an asocial lifestyle.

In 1922 the State Institute of Racial Biology was founded in Uppsala. In the 1930s, a law legitimized forced sterilization of thousands.[7] Another law, passed in 1941, was more far reaching, included a social indication and did not include any age of consent limit.
From 1944, the number of eugenic sterilizations under the 1941 legal provisions gradually decreased.
In Sweden, sterilization was only mandatory before sex change.[8] This last mandatory sterilization has been criticized by several political parties in Sweden and since 2011 the Parliament of Sweden was expected to change the law but ran into opposition from the Christian Democrat party. After efforts to overturn the law failed in parliament, the Stockholm Administrative Court of Appeal overturned the law Dec. 19, declaring it unconstitutional[9][10] after the law was challenged by an unidentified plaintiff.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsory_sterilisation_in_Sweden

De: adria

adria — Tue, 31 May 2016 15:38:00 +0000

Daniel, conform logicii exprimate mai sus, hai sa descarcam toata mostenirea culturala a trecutului, tot ce inaintasii nostrii, oamenii intelepti si integrii au observat si au avertizat.

Daniel, stii tu oare ce vânatoare se da in ultimii 200 de ani, sa stearga anumite carti din memoria colectiva, cum sânt filate anticariatele, bibliotecile publice si universitare sau cel putin ,daca autorii au murit, sa schimbe pe ici pe colo sau sa rastalmaceasca continutul ? Cartea din care am tradus a avut prima editie in 1992; eu am folosit editia din 2007 si am adus la zi unele cifre relevate.

De: Daniel D

Daniel D — Tue, 31 May 2016 08:56:03 +0000

Chiar sunt de acord cu toate ideile de aici.
Insa daca acest articol este doar o traducere a unui text de acum 24 ani, ma iertati, este penibil.
Chiar daca este relevant, insa nu poate proba nimic, aduce nici-un argument.